The eu decision making process

Europe in the Early Middle Ages. Medieval Christendom [29] [30] and the political power of the Papacy [31] [32] are also often cited as premisses[ clarification needed ] to European integration and unity.

The eu decision making process

Temporary Committee of inquiry into the Community transit regime MEPs work with one or several assistants chosen intuiti personae, i. These Committees and European political parties have a large role The eu decision making process the Parliament's work processes.

National factors are not necessarily as important as political ideology: The political groupings are: These small country representatives are always keen to develop their position compared to the 4 bigger ones Germany, France, Italy, UK.

It has now become a regular feature of the EU and meets "at least twice a year", bringing together the heads of state or government to exchange ideas, try to resolve deadlocked problems and give an impetus to the building of the EU.

It provides the EU with a Presidency. The European Council's decisions are only very rarely put to a vote, but are embodied in "conclusions of the Presidency" statements.

COFACE | COFACE - A better society for all families

To become law they would have to follow the normal decision making route, starting with a Commission draft. Every 6 months the Presidency pases to another member state.

There are 5 main area of activity for the Presidency of the EU: The evolution of the EU, Constitutional and institutional matters, The economy and economics of the EU, External relations, But the agenda also depends on priorities that member states decides for their Presidency.

The European Court of Justice: They all derive from principles contained in the Treaties. The large volume of European Union law makes it quite complex, but it does not deal with criminal law or family law.

It is strongly focused on the economic activity of the EU. But has expanded to include environmental, health and safety at work, social welfare, and mutual recognition of educational and professional qualifications.

The Court of Justice has 2 main functions: To be responsible for the direct application of European law To interpret the provision of this law to keep it consistent and uniform among member states.

Its decisions strengthen the EU's policy competence. The principle of mutual recognition avoids increasing the amount of legislation when there is an equivalent in a member state. And finally, the ECJ often clarifies the powers and functioning of the European institutions.

It is a real supra-national institution not influenced by member states. And it is directed at European integration and at individual citizens, such as protecting human rights.

The Economic and Social Committee - "Organised Civil Society" Members from the 15 member states represent the interest of various economic and social groups. The ESC is consulted by the Commission and the Council, about agriculture, transport, training, consumer policy, environment policy, research, regional policies or social affairs.

The members of the ESC are divided in 3 groups: But it is mainly an advisory committee with limited success in influencing the bigger institutions. The Committee of the Regions The Committee of the Regions is made up of members from the regional and local activities to ensure their participation in the integration process.

It is an advisory body to be consulted on training, culture, health, trans-European networks, and regional policy. This institution has been created recently to give a voice to local and regional authorities.

In the context of subsidiarity, regional issues are considered to be of importance.

The eu decision making process

Nonetheless the COR has failed to establish an important role in European integration. It examines the expenditure and revenue of the EU to ensure its transparency. This Court also delivers opinions on various subjects:Reframing the EU budget decision-making process 1.


Introduction "As it stands today [in ], the EU budget is a historical relic. Expenditures, revenues and procedures are all inconsistent with the present and future state of EU integration." The Sapir Report, , p The decision making process in the Council based on a weighted decision rule (also known in Eurojargon as qualified majority voting (QMV)) - each member is assigned a weight (a number of votes); and in order for a bill to be passed by the Council the total weight of those voting for it must equal or exceed qualified majority threshold.

Maritime Interest Representation in the EU Athanasios A.

The eu decision making process

Pallis * Abstract these interests groups in the context of the EU co-decision process of policy-making. The final part weighs the extent that the ‘EU environ-ment’ and the ‘economic environment’ assist, or undermine, the gov-.

Asylum policy guidance for decision making in asylum applications. In simple terms, Decision Making refers to the act or process of making decisions or reaching a decision.

It also constitutes a determination reached after much consideration. Traditionally, however, it is defined as the thought process (cognitive process) of selecting a logical choice or course of action from a set of alternatives.

EU decision-making process explained. EU decision-making process explained. download illustration.

EU decision-making interactive flowchart | Andras Baneth